Everything the artworld doesn't want you to know

Everything the artworld doesn't want you to know

Share this post

Everything the artworld doesn't want you to know
Everything the artworld doesn't want you to know
Materialists
Film Column

Materialists

John McDonald's avatar
John McDonald
Jun 23, 2025
∙ Paid
8

Share this post

Everything the artworld doesn't want you to know
Everything the artworld doesn't want you to know
Materialists
2
Share
Love vs. money in NYC. Is it even a contest?

“A large income is the best recipe for happiness I ever heard of” – Jane Austen, Mansfield Park

After the surprising success of her debut feature, Past Lives (2023), it was inevitable Celine Song would get the opportunity to make a film with a bigger budget and an all-star cast. Materialists is that film: a superior romcom which extracts new life from a wellworn genre.

As all romcoms have their origins in the novels of Jane Austen, it could be argued they are intrinsically no more than parodies, if not travesties. The usual formula is that of Pride and Prejudice, in which an attractive, intelligent young woman from a poor family is repelled by an arrogant wealthy man and links her destiny with a chap from her own class. As the plot thickens, we discover that the low-class fellow is a cad and a phony, and the aristocrat a beacon of morality. By the end of the story, Lizzie has hooked up with Mr. Darcy, and all is well with the world.

There have been countless cinematic variations on this formula, but the basic conundrum is whether one should marry for love or money. In most instances, the problem is magically resolved when the heroine finds out the rich guy is also a warm-and-wonderful human being, opening the door to both love and money. Viewers may embrace this fantasy without much hope of emulating it in their own lives.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 John McDonald
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share